Monthly Archives: August 2015
Poetry Sunday 2 August 2015
One of my favourite TV shows has always been “Rumpole of the Bailey’. The Australian actor Leo McKern revelled in the leading role and made it as much his own as Ronnie Barker did with the character of ‘Fletcher’, the old lag prisoner in the half-hour show ‘Porridge’.
Rumpole was written by John Mortimer (1923-2009) the son of a QC father who advised young John to follow in his own footsteps and study law. Young John, who had had some success as a writer whilst still at Oxford, was tempted to follow the literary path. His father, aware that a writer would spend a great deal of his time working at home, offered the following sage advice;
‘My dear boy, think of your wife. At least the law gets you out of the house.’
Young Mortimer took to the law, adopted a ‘defend the underdog’ practice where he championed unpopular causes including the famous ‘OZ’ trial. Eventually, in 1984, he abandoned the law in favour of full-time writing.
I’m told that the character of Rumpole was based partly on Mortimer’s father who was a fan of poetry and of adventure novels. Certainly Rumpole could be heard intoning great swathes of Wordsworth on the show which darkly mentioned ‘…shades of the prison-house…’ as he marched about, ‘…trailing clouds of glory…’ his dark official garments generously dusted with the ash of his much prized cheroots.
The character of Rumpole was domiciled in a mansion flat at the back of the Albert Hall in London, where he lived with his wife, Hilda, who was always referred to, in hushed and reverential tones as ‘…She Who Must Be Obeyed…’ .
Bear with me. All of this disparate information will eventually make sense.
Henry Rider Haggard (1856-1925) eventually became a hugely popular adventure novelist, having failed spectacularly to be all the things his father wanted him to be. Despairing of the boy, Henry was dispatched from England to an unpaid South African position where he arrived just in time to meet some of the real life adventurers who abounded in Africa at the time. Africa was awash with gold, diamonds and endless opportunity and the place was alive with men eager to seek their fortunes.
Haggard first worked as an unpaid assistant to the Governor of Natal (1877) but was soon transferred to the Transvaal where the British annexation of the Boer Republic of Transvaal was taking place. Haggard, astonishingly, in the absence of the appropriate official, who was ill, was required to both raise the British flag at this hugely important ceremony and also to read the official annexation proclamation!
Now there was no stopping him!
In 1878 he became Registrar of the High Court of Transvaal, a real wage paying position! Within a few years he was back studying in England, married Marriana Margitson, and was called to the Bar in 1884. Haggard’s literary career took off with swashbuckling novels like King Solomon’s Mines, Allan Quartermain and She.
The character of Allan Quartermain, the hero of King Solomon’s Mines, was based on the Englishman Captain Frederick Selous, a ‘great white hunter’, and explorer who counted Teddy Roosevelt, Robert Baden Powell and Cecil Rhodes amongst his friends and who supplied literally hundreds of wildlife specimens to the Natural History Museum in London.
In Haggard’s hugely successful novels, Quartermain hears of the mysterious female leader Ayesha, who is held in awe by members of her African tribe and is known universally as ‘She Who Must Be Obeyed’. Mortimer has Rumpole use this phrase to describe his wife Hilda, but in the same reverential tones as used in the novels. It would not surprise me a bit if Mortimer’s father, like Rumpole, had the habit of referring to Mortimer’s mother in the same way.
And now to the poetry.
In Wordsworth’s ‘Intimations of Immortality’, a much longer poem, the following lines occur, and are quoted by Rumpole at regular intervals, usually in connection with some aspect of the plot. This short section is from ‘Recollections of early Childhood’ and is Wordsworth’s attempt to set out what he sees as our progress on earth from birth to maturity. Wordsworth believes that at birth we arrive on earth with an almost complete memory of our former heavenly existence with God, ‘…who is our home…’
To begin with, as a new born we are still very much part of this heavenly existence because ‘…Heaven lies about us in our infancy!…’
[Life on earth, he thinks, ‘… is but a sleep and a forgetting…’
Almost as if we had fallen asleep in Heaven and that our time on earth is simply a dream.]
Poem begins;
Our birth is but a sleep and a forgetting:
The Soul that rises with us, our life’s Star,
Hath had elsewhere it’s setting,
And cometh from afar:
[The Soul sets like the Sun in Heaven and immediately rises with us on earth as we are born.]
Not in entire forgetfulness,
And not in utter nakedness,
But trailing clouds of glory do we come
From God, who is our home:
[We come as innocent children from Heaven , ‘…trailing clouds of glory…’ and still very much aware of our celestial background.We have not as yet begun to forget the Heaven from whence we came.]
Heaven lies about us in our infancy!
[Then, as the child begins to grow…]
Shades of the prison house begin to close
Upon the growing Boy,
[ Wordsworth is comvinced that the longer we are separated from God and Heaven the more oppressive, the more like a ‘prison house’ our time on earth becomes. Note how the Infant has become the Boy, then the Boy becomes the Youth, and finally he becomes the Man]
But he beholds the light and whence it flows,
He sees it in his joy;
The Youth, who daily farther from the east
Must travel, still is Nature’s Priest,
And by the vision splendid
Is on his way attended;
[Now the Boy has become the Youth, has become older, but nevertheless retains something of the original ‘vision splendid’]
At length the Man perceives it die away,
And fades into the light of common day.
[In the end the Youth, in taking on the business of Manhood, finally loses touch with that eternal beauty and splendour and fades….
A friend, (JD) whose opinion I respect, suggests that this poem might also be about the exercise of the imagination. When we become first aware, our imagination allows us to believe that anything is possible. Children believe absolutely in wizards and fairies and see no reason why flying, or becoming invisible can’t be done. All things, anything you can imagine, are possible as a child.
As we grow older, away from childhood, we are subjected to propaganda by older, ‘sensible’ people which, though well meant, cruelly denies, indeed ridicules these early beliefs. To fit in, to become one with our ‘sensible society, we are then persuaded to like it or lump it, to renounce childish things and, as the precious, childlike way of looking at the world is rejected, so ‘…shades of the prison house begin to close…’
By the time we are adults, most people have absolutely thrown off these embarrassingly attractive notions of invisiblility and flying have faded into the safety and stodginess of everyday life where the exercise of untrammelled imagination has no place, and ‘…the light of common day…’ prevails.
But not all people. Writers, artists and musicians (and lots of others, quietly) refuse to be intimidated by the propaganda of mediocrity and disbelief and instead, cling shamelessly and steadfastly to their dreams.
And here, as a typical example of this, we have Mr William Wordsworth demonstrating absolutely how, by holding onto the creativity of childhood, the Heavenly triumph of the imagination can be splendidly achieved.
(My compliments, JD, and hour in your company was thoroughly inspiring and provided me with sack loads of ideas.)
Ira Maine, Poetry Editor
MDFF 1 August 2015
Hola,
If you’re not aware of my obsession regarding languages, you quite clearly haven’t been paying attention.
A few Dispatches ago I mentioned that a friend had regaled me with some prime examples of “Cop-speak”, inter alia:
…A Policeman in court uttered “ Members rushed into the bedroom and shot the deceased who was alive at the time”…
Another friend often regales me with examples of “Facilitator-speak”:
…You’re invited to this one day event for internal and external organisational and leadership development consultants. If you are interested in role and role clarity in all aspects of life, working systemically and mastering the unspoken language of leadership this experientially designed day with horses could be just what you’ve been looking for…
I can see clearly now…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrHxhQPOO2c
As one gets older there is an increasing incidence of “what if” and “if only” moments.
If only I had had the opportunity to take part in such an experientially designed day with horses, I wouldn’t have muddled during more than half a century without role clarity.
Alas, as my parents used to say: “Als hadden komt, is hebben te laat” (meaning: It is too late, when you use the verb conjugation ‘Had ’)
In amongst my parent’s photo albums there is a photo of a little boy sitting astride a horse in front of a gaucho. That little boy was I. Our home looked out on the edges of“el campo”, since well and truly swallowed up by urban expansion. Not far out, arrieros (drovers) plied their business bringing beef to the abattoirs.
Las penas y las vaquitas se van por la misma senda… las penas son de nosotros las vaquitas son ajenas… (sorrows and cattle follow the same trail, the sorrows are ours, the cattle belong to another) El arriero va:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPbw34Ju_o4
Our milk, bread and ice were delivered by horse and cart (with the horses firmly in front of the carts). Los arrieros, la lechera, and el panadero’s days with horses had not been experientially designed. None the less all had role clarity.
When Wendy was a little girl she use to ride her pony to school. Her days with her pony had not been experientially designed, but all the same, role clarity she did possess.
How different might the circumstances of Remote Aboriginal Australia be, had the perpetrators of the Intervention experienced an experientially designed day with horses?
Had they systemically mastered the unspoken language of leadership? Oh, if only!
Less than half a century ago most people in Yuendumu had role clarity. Stockmen still plied their trade on horseback. Every morning four unlicensed drivers would set off in all cardinal directions with four unregistered tractor & trailers with gangs of uninsured volunteer youth to gather loads of mulga firewood that were distributed around the camps. None were wearing bright yellow luminescent safety jackets. More recently the feral horse population around Yuendumu had exploded. More than one thousand horses were shot from helicopters. Apart from some token consultations, I believe Warlpiri people had no role in the cull. Old people often go without firewood. The most common contemporary role for Warlpiri people is as clients.
A few months ago a Dispatch featured Patrick Davies’ Rocky old Road:
And all they can take has been stolen…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFAdylvx34c
Often we have thought that all they can take has been stolen (stolen languages, stolen children, stolen liberty, stolen land, stolen futures) only to become aware of yet another theft: Stolen roles!
All the tricks that are tried are not new
They’re just wrapped in gift wrapping paper
And handed as favours to you
So is our soon to be opened $7.6M Police Complex such a Gift Horse? Am I being ungrateful by looking in its mouth?
And no you can’t take all that you’re given
Oft times it means selling your soul
I think it is a Trojan Horse!
Chau,
Frank
PS-An experientially designed day with horses…. Mexican style….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UV49Y9EEHr8